JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Clinical Pathology 2006;59:89-94; doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.024513
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, R G
Right arrow Articles by Husby, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, R G
Right arrow Articles by Husby, S

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Eosinophilia in the upper gastrointestinal tract is not a characteristic feature in cow’s milk sensitive gastro–oesophageal reflux disease. Measurement by two methodologies

R G Nielsen1, C Fenger2, C Bindslev-Jensen3, S Husby1

1 Department of Paediatrics, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Dk-5000 Odense C, Denmark
2 Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital
3 The Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital

Correspondence to:
Dr R G Nielsen
Department of Paediatrics (H), Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, Dk-5000 Odense C, Denmark; rgn{at}dadlnet.dk Background: An association between cow’s milk hypersensitivity (CMH) and gastro–oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in childhood has been reported in the past decade.

Aim: To assess whether biopsies from the upper gastrointestinal tract of children with cow’s milk sensitive GERD have a specific allergic inflammatory pattern, and to compare two different techniques for measuring inflammatory cells in gastrointestinal biopsies.

Methods: GERD was diagnosed by means of endoscopy and oesophageal pH monitoring. Hypersensitivity to cow’s milk was determined by an elimination diet and cow’s milk challenge. Allergic inflammatory cells in upper gastrointestinal biopsies were identified by immunohistochemistry and their numbers were assessed by two different methods—counting the number of cells/high power field and using the computerised Cast-Grid system.

Results: Cow’s milk sensitive GERD was identified in 10 of 17 children with severe GERD (median age, 7.8 years). Biopsies from children with endoscopic oesophagitis had significantly increased numbers of mast cells and T cells. No differences in the number of eosinophils, mast cells, or T cells were found between children with CMH and those with primary GERD. Several differences were found between the two different histological quantification methods.

Conclusions: CMH was found not only in infants but also in school age children with GERD. Histology did not identify the cow’s milk sensitive GERD subgroup. The computerised histological method provides a more complete evaluation based upon total biopsy area, and helped to limit the bias of uneven biopsy size.


Abbreviations: GERD, gastro–oesophageal reflux disease; HPF, high power field

Keywords: food allergy; gastro–oesophageal reflux disease; eosinophils; quantification; children




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
S. Yu, M. Kollarik, A. Ouyang, A. C. Myers, and B. J. Undem
Mast cell-mediated long-lasting increases in excitability of vagal C fibers in guinea pig esophagus
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): G850 - G856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.