JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:1000-1001; doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.022186
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Twomey, P J
Right arrow Articles by Pledger, D R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Twomey, P J
Right arrow Articles by Pledger, D R

SHORT REPORT

Differences between serum and plasma for intact parathyroid hormone measurement in patients with chronic renal failure in routine clinical practice

P J Twomey, T Whitlock, D R Pledger

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr P J Twomey
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD, UK; patrick.twomey{at}ipswichhospital.nhs.uk
ABSTRACT
Background: Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is important in the evaluation of patients with calcium metabolism disorders and/or chronic renal disease.

Aims: To assess the differences between serum and plasma PTH measurements using the Advia Centaur.

Methods: Twenty six paired serum and edetate samples from patients with chronic renal failure were analysed using the Advia Centaur.

Results: The EDTA results ranged from 2.3 to 76.1 pmol/litre and the Deming regression equation was: serum = 0.8927 EDTA – 0.447. The percentage difference plot had a mean difference of 13.8% (95% confidence interval, 2.2% to 25.4%; significant). The available time to separation and freezing ranged from 10 to 231 (median, 85) minutes. The correlation coefficient for the percentage difference against the time to separation and the percentage difference against the mean PTH concentration were –0.13 and –0.07, respectively.

Conclusions: These results go beyond the previous controlled research conditions by showing that such differences between serum and edentate plasma exist in routine clinical practice. They also show that intra-individual PTH differences as large as 25.0% can exist on the same day between serum and edetate plasma. This may partly explain some of the variability of PTH concentrations found in some patients with chronic renal failure.


Abbreviations: PTH, parathyroid hormone

Keywords: intact parathyroid hormone; Advia Centaur; routine practice; patient variability; sample type







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.