Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:629-633; doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.021733
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:629-633
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Lymphoma associated chromosomal abnormalities can easily be detected by FISH on tissue imprints. An underused diagnostic alternative

I Buño1, P Nava1, A Álvarez-Doval2, F Álvarez-Rodríguez2, J L Díez-Martín1 and J Menárguez2

1 Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Hospital G.U. Gregorio Marañón, C/ Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain
2 Pathology Department, Hospital G.U. Gregorio Marañón

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J Menárguez
Department of Pathology, Gregorio Marañón G.U. Hospital, C/ Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain; javier.menarguez{at}madrid.org

Background: Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) is useful for detecting specific chromosomal abnormalities in various tumours. In lymphomas, diagnosis is frequently made using paraffin wax embedded tissue. However, FISH performed under these conditions presents potential technical problems and difficulties in interpretation.

Aims: To show that FISH using tissue imprints and cytopreps or alternatively, bone marrow (BM) smears, constitutes an easy and rapid strategy to overcome these constraints.

Methods: The study comprised 46 patients with lymphoma. Sixty nine tissue imprints, cytopreps, or BM smears were analysed by FISH. Dual colour, dual fusion FISH probes were used to detect the t(8;14), t(11;14), and t(14;18) translocations, whereas a dual colour breakapart FISH probe was used to detect chromosomal translocations involving the BCL6 gene.

Results: Tissue imprints and cytopreps were successfully hybridised in all 52 cases, whereas hybridisation was successful in 16 of 17 archival BM smears. All patients could be analysed to identify either the presence or absence of chromosomal translocations.

Conclusions: The use of tissue imprints, cytopreps, or BM smears to identify chromosomal abnormalities by FISH is a rapid and useful ancillary approach for diagnostic purposes. Therefore, it could be used on a routine basis whenever fresh samples are available.

Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; SSC, saline sodium citrate

Keywords: lymphoma; tissue imprints; chromosomal abnormalities; fluorescence in situ hybridisation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs