| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen’s Hospital, Belvedere Road, Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire DE13 0RB, UK
2 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Queen’s Hospital
Correspondence to:
Professor T M Reynolds
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Queen’s Hospital, Belvedere Road, Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 0RB, UK; tim.reynolds{at}clinchem.org.uk
Background: CA125 is a high molecular weight glycoprotein, which is expressed by a large proportion of epithelial ovarian cancers. The sensitivity and specificity of CA125 are poor and there are no guidelines produced by the Royal College of Pathologists or the Association of Clinical Biochemists to aid clinicians and laboratories in its most appropriate use.
Aim: To identify the patient population having a CA125 measurement and to determine its contribution to individual patient management.
Methods: A retrospective case note audit looking at patients who had a CA125 measurement performed between April 2000 and April 2002.
Results: The study comprised 799 patients; 751 (94%) were female and 48 (6%) male; 221 (29%) females and 22 (46%) males had an abnormal result. CA125 was mainly used to investigate a wide range of signs and symptoms, and few tests were for follow up or screening of ovarian cancer. In female patients having a CA125 for suspicion of malignancy/ovarian cancer, only 39 (20%) of the abnormal results were caused by ovarian cancer. False positive results were largely caused by another malignancy (48 cases; 26%), benign ovarian disease (26 cases; 14%), and benign gynaecological conditions, particularly leiomyomas (18 cases; 9%). The specificity of CA125 for ovarian cancer increased with concentrations >1000 kU/litre.
Conclusions: These results confirm the high false positive rate and poor sensitivity and specificity associated with CA125. The substantial inappropriate usage of CA125 has led to results that are useless to the clinician, have cost implications, and add to patient anxiety and clinical uncertainty.
Abbreviations: AFP, 
fetoprotein; HCG, human chorionic gonadotrophin
Keywords: CA125; ovarian cancer; tumour marker
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. C. Dearking, G. D. Aletti, M. E. McGree, A. L. Weaver, M.-K. Sommerfield, and W. A. Cliby How Relevant Are ACOG and SGO Guidelines for Referral of Adnexal Mass? Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2007; 110(4): 841 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. F. Lopez, A. Mikulskis, S. Kuzdzal, E. Golenko, E. F. Petricoin III, L. A. Liotta, W. F. Patton, G. R. Whiteley, K. Rosenblatt, P. Gurnani, et al. A Novel, High-Throughput Workflow for Discovery and Identification of Serum Carrier Protein-Bound Peptide Biomarker Candidates in Ovarian Cancer Samples Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1067 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Scholler, M. Crawford, A. Sato, C. W. Drescher, K. C. O'Briant, N. Kiviat, G. L. Anderson, and N. Urban Bead-based ELISA for validation of ovarian cancer early detection markers. Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7 Pt 1): 2117 - 2124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Lowenthal, A. I. Mehta, K. Frogale, R. W. Bandle, R. P. Araujo, B. L. Hood, T. D. Veenstra, T. P. Conrads, P. Goldsmith, D. Fishman, et al. Analysis of Albumin-Associated Peptides and Proteins from Ovarian Cancer Patients Clin. Chem., October 1, 2005; 51(10): 1933 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| Journal of Clinical Pathology | Molecular Pathology |
