Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2005;58:1261-1264; doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.027953
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Histological examination has a major impact on macroscopic necropsy diagnoses

F D C Bernardi, P H N Saldiva and T Mauad

Department of Pathology, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Sao Paulo SP, 01246-903 Brazil

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr T Mauad
Department of Pathology, São Paulo University Medical School, Avenida Dr Arnaldo, 455 1st Floor, Sao Paulo SP, 01246-903 Brazil; tmauad{at}usp.br

Background: Necropsy is the gold standard for clinicopathological discrepancy studies and epidemiological surveys. Inadequate sampling or lack of tissue may hamper the final interpretation and quality of the necropsy.

Aim: To compare the histological and gross necropsy diagnoses of different organs.

Methods: A retrospective comparison of the provisional reports (gross findings only) and the final reports (after histological examination) of the necropsies performed at the department of pathology of the Hospital das Clínicas, Sao Paulo University, Brazil, a large tertiary care complex, in 2001. The total number of diagnoses listed for the lungs, heart, liver, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen were calculated. Findings were categorised into concordant/refined diagnosis, discordant/additional diagnosis, histology needed, and inconclusive.

Results: Three hundred and seventy one postmortem reports were analysed. There were 214 men and 157 women, with a mean age of 50.3 years, ranging from 1 to 92. The lung received the highest number (954) and the pancreas the lowest number (390) of diagnoses. The highest frequencies of discrepancies between the gross and microscopic findings were found in the lung and the liver: 38.7% and 35.1%, respectively. The brain had the lowest frequency of discrepancies. In a small number of cases, the final diagnosis could only be achieved through microscopic analysis, with the highest frequency being found in the kidneys (8.5%).

Conclusions: Histological analysis has a major impact on previously performed gross diagnosis at necropsy, especially in the lungs, liver, and kidneys. Adequate sampling and histological analysis are important for necropsy quality.

Keywords: necropsy; quality control; gross diagnosis; histological diagnosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Moving beyond the gross appearance: the value of an accurate histological analysis
Fabio De Giorgio, et al.
JCP Online, 5 May 2006 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs