JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hargitai, B
Right arrow Articles by Cox, P M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hargitai, B
Right arrow Articles by Cox, P M
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Risk Pregnancy
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:785-792
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists


acp

BEST PRACTICE NO 178

Examination of the human placenta

B Hargitai1, T Marton2, P M Cox3

1 No 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis University Budapest, Baross u. 27, 1088 Budapest, Hungary
2 Department of Histopathology, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, Metchley Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
3 Department of Histopathology, Birmingham Women’s Hospital

Correspondence to:
Dr T Marton
Department of Histopathology, Birmingham Women’s Hospital, Metchley Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK; Tamas.Marton{at}bwhct.nhs.uk
ABSTRACT
The human placenta is an underexamined organ. The clinical indications for placental examination have no gold standards. There is also inconsistency in the histological reports and the quality is variable. There is great interobserver variability concerning the different entities. Although there are still grey areas in clinicopathological associations, a few mainstream observations have now been clarified. The histopathological examination and diagnosis of the placenta may provide crucial information. It is possible to highlight treatable maternal conditions and identify placental or fetal conditions that can be recurrent or inherited. To achieve optimal benefit from placental reports, it is essential to standardise the method of placenta examination. This article summarises the clinical indications for placenta referral and the most common acknowledged clinicopathological correlations.


Abbreviations: AAA, arterio–arterial anastomosis; AVA, arterio–venous anastomosis; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; VVA, veno–venous anastomosis

Keywords: placenta; pathology; protocol; examination







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.