JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Twomey, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Twomey, P J
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:752-754
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640

P J Twomey

Correspondence to:
Dr P J Twomey
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, The Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK; Taptwomey{at}aol.com Background: Diabetes mellitus is an important diagnosis. New criteria have been defined for impaired glucose metabolism and, accordingly, there is a need for precise and accurate glucose analysis for the correct classification of patients. However, neither the World Health Organisation nor the National Service Framework for Diabetes in England and Wales deal with the associated analytical issues for plasma glucose.

Aims/Methods: To compare two different methods for plasma glucose with respect to European and CLIA ’88 quality requirements.

Results: Using several different graphical and statistical techniques, the YSI 2300 STAT was found to be 8.1–8.4% negatively biased for plasma glucose when compared with the Olympus AU640 method.

Conclusions: Such a large bias would have a large impact on the detection of diabetes mellitus in clinical practice and therefore this method should not be used to make a definitive diagnosis. The bias probably results from the fact that the YSI 2300 STAT uses an aqueous based standard.


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; WHO, World Health Organisation; YSI, Yellow Springs Instrument

Keywords: diabetes; accuracy; bias; calibration; methods




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. J. Twomey, A. Viljoen, T. M. Reynolds, and A. S. Wierzbicki
Biological Variation in HbA1c Predicts Risk of Retinopathy and Nephropathy in Type 1 Diabetes: Response to McCarter et al.
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2004; 27(10): 2569 - 2569.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.