Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:309-311; doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.013052
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:309-311
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Terminology used by pathologists in reporting on sudden infant deaths

S R Limerick and C J Bacon

Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths, Artillery House, 111–9 Artillery Row, London SW1P 1RT, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C J Bacon
Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths, Artillery House, 111–9 Artillery Row, London SW1P 1RT, UK; Chrisandheatherbacon{at}ukonline.co.uk

Aim: To determine whether the terms used by pathologists in reporting on sudden infant deaths are applied consistently.

Method: Postal survey.

Results: Replies were received from 63 pathologists who carry out necropsies after sudden infant deaths. There was a pronounced variation in their use of the terms "sudden infant death syndrome" and "unascertained", with the last term being applied not only when there were apparently suspicious features but also in various other circumstances. Opinions were divided as to whether the term "sudden infant death syndrome" still serves a useful purpose. Deaths that had occurred while bed sharing were categorised in several different ways. Many pathologists commented on the inadequacy of the history available to them at the time of their report.

Conclusions: There is a serious need for greater consistency in the way pathologists report on sudden death in infants. Pathologists should be provided with a full history before they carry out the necropsy.

Keywords: deaths categorised as "unascertained"; sudden infant deaths; terms used by pathologists

Abbreviations: ONS, Office of National Statistics; SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome; SUDI, sudden unexpected deaths in infancy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hauck, F. R., Tanabe, K. O. (2008). International Trends in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Stabilization of Rates Requires Further Action. Pediatrics 122: 660-666 [Full Text]  
  • Bacon, C J, Braithwaite, W. Y., Hey, E N (2007). Uncertainty in classification of repeat sudden unexpected infant deaths in Care of the Next Infant programme. BMJ 335: 129-131 [Full Text]  
  • Fleming, P J, Blair, P S (2005). How reliable are SIDS rates? The importance of a standardised, multiprofessional approach to "diagnosis". Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 993-994 [Full Text]  
  • Sheehan, K M, McGarvey, C, Devaney, D M, Matthews, T (2005). How reliable are SIDS rates?. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 1082-1083 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Loughrey, C M, Preece, M A, Green, A (2005). Sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI). J. Clin. Pathol. 58: 20-21 [Full Text]  
  • (2004). Pathologists' terminology for sudden infant deaths. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 841-841 [Full Text]  
  • Levene, S, Bacon, C J (2004). Sudden unexpected death and covert homicide in infancy. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 443-447 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs