JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verrill, C
Right arrow Articles by Seel, E H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verrill, C
Right arrow Articles by Seel, E H
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:1165-1167
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Histopathological assessment of lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma: does triple levelling detect significantly more metastases?

C Verrill, N J Carr, E Wilkinson-Smith, E H Seel

Department of Histopathology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr C Verrill
Department of Histopathology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; clareverrill{at}hotmail.com Aims: Standard practice is to take one section from every lymph node found in colorectal carcinoma resection specimens, to look for metastatic carcinoma. This study evaluates whether assessing three sections separated by 100 µm detects significantly more metastases in nodes than the conventional single section.

Methods: A retrospective study of 100 colorectal carcinoma resection specimens. All blocks containing lymph nodes had two extra histological sections cut (separated by 100 µm) and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. The original slide was called level 1, and the extra two sections levels 2 and 3.

Results: Twenty Dukes’s A (equivalent to WHO-UICC stage grouping I, pTNM stage pT1/2N0), 43 Dukes’s B (equivalent to WHO-UICC stage grouping II, pTNM stage pT3/4N0), and 37 Dukes’s C (equivalent to WHO-UICC stage grouping III, pTNM stage at least pN1) cases were examined (total 1453 nodes). Twelve extra metastases (in 11 patients) were discovered in nodes at levels 2 and 3, which were negative in level 1. Ten cases were Dukes’s C and, in one patient, this led to upstaging from N1 to N2 (pTNM classification system). One case was Dukes’s B and the discovery of a single metastasis on level 2 upstaged it to Dukes’s C.

Conclusions: Triple levelling detected more tumour deposits than the conventional single section. In two patients, the staging classification of the lesion was changed, with potentially important implications for prognosis and management.


Abbreviations: H&E, haematoxylin and eosin

Keywords: cancer; colorectal; histopathology; lymph nodes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
S. McGrath, S. Cross, and S. A. Pritchard
Histopathological assessment of lymph nodes in upper gastrointestinal cancer: does triple levelling detect significantly more metastases?
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1222 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.