JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kay, E
Right arrow Articles by Jasani, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kay, E
Right arrow Articles by Jasani, B
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:1140-1144
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Use of tissue microarray for interlaboratory validation of HER2 immunocytochemical and FISH testing

E Kay1, A O’Grady1, J M Morgan2, S Wozniak2, B Jasani2

1 Department of Pathology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
2 Department of Histopathology, University Hospital of Wales and College of Medicine, Cardiff CF4 4XN, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor E Kay
Department of Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; mleader{at}iol.ie Aims: To evaluate the use of tissue microarray (TMA) technology as a validation tool for HER2 testing by both immunocytochemistry (ICC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in the diagnostic setting.

Methods: TMA constructs from 57 cases of breast cancer were evaluated for HER2 (by ICC and FISH) by two centres. The results were compared.

Results: There was a high level of concordance for both ICC and FISH. In five "discrepant" cases only three would have had a potential impact on patient management.

Conclusions: Validation of HER2 analysis in the clinical setting by ICC and FISH is essential. The use of TMAs provides for an economy of scale and would be practical in the setting of interlaboratory and intralaboratory validation. It is suggested that routine HER2 ICC and FISH should continue to be performed in laboratories on whole sections. Following this, TMAs would be constructed for all cases of breast cancer. ICC and FISH would be performed on these to validate the results. The TMAs would be available for circulation to other centres for validation purposes. The standardisation of testing between centres, the potential difficulty of minimum case numbers, and the workload issues surrounding validation would all be facilitated by this approach.


Abbreviations: ICC, immunocytochemistry; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; NEQAS, National External Quality Assurance Scheme; RCSI, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; TMA, tissue microarray

Keywords: HER2; immunocytochemistry; fluorescence in situ hybridisation; validation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.