JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burchill, S A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burchill, S A
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Neuroblastoma
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2004;57:14-20
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists


REVIEW

Micrometastases in neuroblastoma: are they clinically important?

S A Burchill

Correspondence to:
Dr S A Burchill
Children’s Cancer Research Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; s.a.burchill{at}leeds.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
Despite advances in the treatment of neuroblastoma (NBL), recurrence and metastases continue to pose major problems in clinical management. The relation between micrometastases and the development of secondary disease is not fully understood. However, accurate methods to detect low numbers of tumour cells may allow the evaluation of their role in the disease process, and by implication the possible benefits of eliminating them. Although there is substantial evidence for the increased sensitivity of current molecular methods for the detection of NBL cells compared with more conventional cytology, the clinical relevance and usefulness of detecting this disease remain controversial. The primary goal of current translational research must be to evaluate the clinical relevance of micrometastatic disease detected by these methods in multicentre prospective clinical outcome studies. Only then can the clinical usefulness of these methods be defined so that they may be introduced into relevant clinical practice.


Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; IC, immunocytology; NBL, neuroblastoma; PB, peripheral blood; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cells; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, reverse transcriptase; TH, tyrosine hydroxylase

Keywords: micrometastases; neuroblastoma; clinical significance; minimal residual disease; immunocytology; reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
M M Reid
Minimal metastatic disease
J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2004; 57(1): 21 - 21.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.