JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ironside, J W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ironside, J W
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:561-568
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. & Association of Clinical Pathologists


acp

Best Practice No 172

Pituitary gland pathology

J W Ironside

Correspondence to:
Professor J W Ironside, Division of Pathology, School of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK;
j.w.ironside{at}ed.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
This article reviews published evidence on the diagnosis and classification of pituitary gland tumours and the relevance of histological and genetic features to prognosis. Much of the literature is devoted to the histological, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical classification of pituitary adenomas (extensively supported by multicentre studies), with little consensus on the identification of prognostic features in adenomas, particularly in relation to invasion. There is a lack of correspondence between clinical and pathological criteria to identify and classify invasion, and a need to reassess the nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for invasive adenomas and carcinomas. Recent cytogenetic, genetic, and molecular biological studies have identified no consistent abnormalities in relation to pituitary tumour progression, although many genes are likely to be involved. In light of these uncertainties, an approach to the diagnosis and classification of pituitary adenomas is suggested, based on robust criteria from earlier studies and incorporating provisional data that require reassessment in large prospective studies with an adequate clinicopathological database.


Keywords: pituitary adenoma; intraoperative diagnosis; invasion; immunocytochemistry; genetics

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotrophic hormone; CI, computerised tomography; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; GH, growth hormone; MEN-1, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PRL, prolactin; ptd-FGFR-4, pituitary tumour derived N terminally truncated isoform of fibroblast growth factor receptor-4; PTTG, pituitary tumour transforming gene; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. N. Saleem, A.-H. M. Said, and D. H. Lee
Lesions of the Hypothalamus: MR Imaging Diagnostic Features
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1087 - 1108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. A. Kaltsas, P. Nomikos, G. Kontogeorgos, M. Buchfelder, and A. B. Grossman
Diagnosis and Management of Pituitary Carcinomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 3089 - 3099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.