Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:374-377; doi:10.1136/jcp.56.5.374
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:374-377
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of a protocol for examining nephrectomy specimens with renal cell carcinoma

D F R Griffiths1, N Nind2, C J O’Brien3, M Rashid4 and A Verghese5

1 Department of Pathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
2 Department of Histopathology, Princess of Wales Hospital, Coity Road, Bridgend CF31 1RQ, UK
3 Department of Histopathology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK
4 Department of Histopathology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport NP20 2UB, UK
5 Department of Histopathology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Armthorpe Road, Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN2 5LT, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D F R Griffiths, Department of Pathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK;
griffithsdfr{at}cf.ac.uk

Aims: To evaluate the practicality of use and the effectiveness of a standard protocol for examining nephrectomy specimens for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with emphasis on the identification of vascular invasion.

Methods: A standard protocol, devised to identify the major prognostic determinants, was used to examine 79 consecutive tumours submitted to four histopathology departments. The incidence of vascular invasion found was compared with the incidence in a historical series of tumours.

Results: The protocol proved easy to follow, and appeared to increase the incidence of observed vascular invasion (40 of 69 cases compared with 69 of 176 cases in the historical series; p = 0.059, Fishers exact test, one sided)

Conclusions: If pathological prognostic determinants are to be used for clinical management, then it is important that they are identified and recorded consistently. The protocol described provides a method of examining nephrectomy specimens that can be used in routine practice and would probably reliably identify recognised prognostic variables.

Keywords: renal cell cancer; pathology; technical methods; prognostic indices; nephrectomy

Abbreviations: IVC, inferior vena cava; IVCI, inferior vena cava invasion; MVI, microvascular invasion; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RVI, renal vein invasion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Soilleux, E J, Roberts, I S D (2006). Assessment of the Cardiff nephrectomy cut-up protocol with total blocking of the renal sinus: effect on tumour staging and practical issues.. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 1209-1211 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fleming, S, Griffiths, D F R (2005). Best Practice No 180 Nephrectomy for renal tumour; dissection guide and dataset. J. Clin. Pathol. 58: 7-14 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs