© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Association of Clinical Pathologists
REVIEW
Guidelines for processing and reporting of prostatic needle biopsies
1 Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Anatomy-Pathology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil, 4200 Porto, Portugal
3 Department of Anatomy-Pathology, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, 28905 Getafe (Madrid), Spain
4 Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Östra, S-41685 Göteborg, Sweden
5 Department of Pathology, Academic Hospital Middelheim, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
6 Department of Pathology, Centre for Laboratory Medicine, FIN-33521 Tampere, Finland
7 Department of Pathology, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
8 Institue of Pathology, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Th H van der Kwast, Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
vanderkwast{at}path.fgg.eur.nl
The reported detection rate of prostate cancer, lesions suspicious for cancer, and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in needle biopsies is highly variable. In part, technical factors, including the quality of the biopsies, the tissue processing, and histopathological reporting, may account for these differences. It has been thought that standardisation of tissue processing might reduce the observed variations in detection rate. Consensus among the members of the pathology committee of the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) concerning the optimal methodology of tissue embedding resulting in guidelines for prostatic needle biopsy processing was reached. The adoption of an unequivocal and uniform way of reporting lesions encountered in prostatic needle biopsies is considered helpful for decision taking by the clinician. The definition of parameters for quality control of prostatic needle biopsy diagnostics will further facilitate clinical epidemiological multicentre studies of prostate cancer.
Keywords: prostate cancer; needle biopsy; histopathology; tissue processing; quality control
Abbreviations: ERSPC, European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer; PIN, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; PSA, prostate specific antigen
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Singh, P B, Saw, N K, Haq, A, Blades, R A, Martin, F L, Matanhelia, S S, Nicholson, C M
(2008). Use of tissue ink to maintain identification of individual cores on needle biopsies of the prostate. J. Clin. Pathol.
61: 1055-1057
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
