JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carder, P J
Right arrow Articles by Liston, J C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carder, P J
Right arrow Articles by Liston, J C
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Breast Cancer
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:133-138
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Association of Clinical Pathologists


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a "B3" breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate?

P J Carder1, J C Liston2

1 Department of Pathology, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
2 Leeds/Wakefield Breast Screening Unit, Seacroft Hospital, York Road, Leeds LS14 6UH, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr P J Carder, Department of Pathology, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK;
paulinecarder{at}doctors.org.uk Aim: To audit the benign surgical biopsies in women screened, assessed, and referred by the Leeds/Wakefield Breast Screening Unit for the year 1999–2000 with a view to determining any association with a preoperative B3 core biopsy categorisation.

Methods: The results of all preoperative diagnostic procedures in all patients who underwent surgical excision for a lesion proving benign in the year 1999–2000 were reviewed. Cases were categorised according to whether the preoperative fine needle aspirate cytology (FNAC) or core biopsy had been equivocal or of uncertain malignant potential (C3/B3), inadequate or unrepresentative (C1/B1), or benign (C2/B2). In those cases with a C3/B3 FNAC or core biopsy result, reasons for the uncertainty were determined by examination of the report and, where necessary, slides. In cases with C1/B1 or C2/B2 investigations and in those without a preoperative procedure, the reasons for surgical referral were determined from the screening records. Case records of all patients with a B3 core biopsy categorisation who subsequently proved to have malignancy were also reviewed.

Results: Thirty six women had benign surgical biopsies in the 1999–2000 screening year. In 13 of the 36 patients, referral for diagnostic biopsy rested on radiological and/or pathological suspicion of radial scar. The core biopsy category was B3 in all but one, which was in the B1 category. In a further 10 patients, referral was based primarily on a pathological B3 categorisation. The reasons for this were as follows: papillary lesion (two), fibroepithelial lesion (two), atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (two), stromal mucin (two), atypical lobular hyperplasia (one), and an unusual vascular lesion (one). Two cases with a C3 on FNAC also derived from papillary lesions. In the remaining nine patients, the radiological features were sufficiently suspicious to prompt referral in the presence of either inadequate/unrepresentative (C1/B1) or benign (B2) preoperative pathological findings. Two women had no preoperative needle biopsy.

Conclusions: In 22 of 36 benign biopsies, the initial core biopsy categorisation was B3. According to the current system of core biopsy categorisation, a diversity of lesions must be designated as of "uncertain malignant potential" (B3) because the technique provides insufficient tissue for full histological assessment. The use of this category may increase the number of benign biopsies if all such cases are referred for surgery. An increase in the benign biopsy rate may be averted if larger amounts of tissue can be obtained using newer vacuum assisted techniques such as the Mammotome.


Keywords: benign biopsies; B3 category; breast screening; core biopsy

Abbreviations: ADH, atypical ductal hyperplasia; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; FNAC, fine needle aspirate cytology; LCIS, lobular carcinoma in situ




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
P J Carder, T Khan, P Burrows, and N Sharma
Large volume "mammotome" biopsy may reduce the need for diagnostic surgery in papillary lesions of the breast
J. Clin. Pathol., August 1, 2008; 61(8): 928 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. F. Dillon, E. W. McDermott, A. D. Hill, A. O'Doherty, N. O'Higgins, and C. M. Quinn
Predictive Value of Breast Lesions of "Uncertain Malignant Potential" and "Suspicious for Malignancy" Determined by Needle Core Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 704 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
P J Carder, V Speirs, J Ramsdale, and M R J Lansdown
Expression of prostate specific antigen in male breast cancer
J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2005; 58(1): 69 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
M Kennedy, A V Masterson, M Kerin, and F Flanagan
Pathology and clinical relevance of radial scars: a review
J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2003; 56(10): 721 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.