Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:731-735; doi:10.1136/jcp.56.10.731
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2003;56:731-735
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. & Association of Clinical Pathologists

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Prevention of catheter related bloodstream infection by silver iontophoretic central venous catheters: a randomised controlled trial

J J Bong1, P Kite2, M H Wilco2 and M J McMahon1

1 Division of Surgery, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
2 Department of Microbiology, The General Infirmary, Leeds, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J J Bong, Limit Suite, Wellcome Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, UK;
jjb{at}jinbong.freeserve.co.uk

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of silver iontophoretic central venous catheters in preventing catheter related colonisation and bloodstream infection among high risk patients in a tertiary hospital.

Methods: Patients requiring central venous access for a period greater than seven days were stratified into two groups according to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria before being randomly assigned to receive either silver iontophoretic or control catheters. The incidence of catheter colonisation and catheter related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) was recorded.

Results: Three hundred and four single lumen study catheters were inserted into 268 patients. Total duration of catheterisation was 5449 days (median, 12 days/catheter). Complete data could be evaluated in 270 catheters: 128 silver iontophoretic catheters and 140 untreated catheters. Forty seven silver iontophoretic catheters (36.7%) were colonised compared with 48 control catheters (33.8%). Seven cases (5.5%) of CRBSI occurred in patients who received silver iontophoretic catheters, compared with 11 cases (7.7%) in patients receiving control catheters. There was no significant difference in the incidence of catheter colonisation or CRBSI between silver iontophoretic and control catheters. When the duration of catheter placement was taken into consideration, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in the risk of CRBSI between the silver iontophoretic catheters and the untreated catheters (p = 0.77).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the incidence of catheter colonisation or CRBSI among high risk patients between silver iontophoretic catheters and control catheters. Future prospective, randomised studies with a larger number of catheters are encouraged to confirm or refute these results.

Keywords: antiseptics; catheter related bloodstream infection; central venous catheter; iontophoresis; silver ions

Abbreviations: CFU, colony forming units; CI, confidence interval; CRBSI, catheter related bloodstream infection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Maki, D. G., Kluger, D. M., Crnich, C. J. (2006). The Risk of Bloodstream Infection in Adults With Different Intravascular Devices: A Systematic Review of 200 Published Prospective Studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 81: 1159-1171 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • (2004). Other articles noted: 25 Jul 03 to 7 Nov 03. Evid. Based Nurs. 7: e1-1 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs