JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, T N
Right arrow Articles by Shirley, S E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, T N
Right arrow Articles by Shirley, S E
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2002;55:608-612
© 2002 Journal of Clinical Pathology


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Necropsy request practices in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies

T N Gibson1, C T Escoffery1, S E Shirley1

1 Department of Pathology, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica

Correspondence to:
Dr C T Escoffery, Department of Pathology, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica;
cescoffy{at}cwjamaica.com Aim: To investigate necropsy request practices at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica, to determine the extent to which these might influence the declining necropsy rates. This is the first such study from a developing country.

Methods: The necropsy service was audited prospectively over a six month period, and data relating to non-coroner’s (hospital) necropsy requests, including the clinical service and post of the clinician involved, were documented. The reasons for non-request were recorded for deaths in which a necropsy was not requested, in addition to the reasons given by pathologists for not performing necropsies in cases that were requested but not done. The overall, non-coroner’s, and coroner’s necropsy rates in addition to the non-coroner’s necropsy request and success rates were calculated.

Results: There were 364 deaths comprising 323 non-coroner’s and 41 coroner’s cases. The overall, non-coroner’s, and coroner’s necropsy rates were 29.2%, 20.2%, and 38.7%, respectively. The non-coroner’s necropsy request rate was 35.3% with a success rate of 65%. Seventy five per cent of the requests were made by non-consultant clinicians and on the internal medicine service, which accounted for most of the non-coroner’s deaths; necropsy requests were biased towards younger patients (p < 0.0001). Confident clinical diagnosis was the main reason for not requesting a necropsy, and the primary reason for refusing to perform a necropsy was that the request had been made too long after death.

Conclusions: These findings show a relatively high necropsy success rate in the face of a comparatively low necropsy request rate, and indicate that necropsy rates can be increased if clinicians make more necropsy requests in a timely manner in patients of all ages.


Keywords: autopsy request practices; necropsy request rates; necropsy rates; Jamaica

Abbreviations: UHWI, University Hospital of the West Indies; UWI, University of the West Indies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
T N Gibson, S E Shirley, C T Escoffery, and M Reid
Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies
J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2004; 57(9): 980 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
D Mcguone and E W Kay
The impact of the organ retention controversy on the practice of hospital necropsy: a four year audit
J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2004; 57(4): 448 - 448.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J L Burton and J C E Underwood
Necropsy practice after the "organ retention scandal": requests, performance, and tissue retention
J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2003; 56(7): 537 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.