JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helbert, M
Right arrow Articles by MacCallum, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helbert, M
Right arrow Articles by MacCallum, P
J Clin Pathol 2001; 54:693-698
© 2001 Journal of Clinical Pathology

Optimising testing for phospholipid antibodies

M Helbert, S Bodger, J Cavenagh, D D'Cruz, J M Thomas, P MacCallum

Department of Immunopathology, St Bartholomews and the London NHS Trust, London EC1A 7BE, UK
Department of Clinical Haematology, Medical Dental School, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London EC1A, UK
Department of Rheumatology, Medical Dental School, Queen Mary and Westfield College
Computer Department, Medical Dental School, Queen Mary and Westfield College

Dr Helbert mrhelbert{at}mds.qmw.ac.uk Aim—To compare anticardiolipin (ACL) and anti-ß2 glycoprotein 1 (ß2gp1) enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and to incorporate these results into a meta-analysis of published data.

Method—Three representative commercial ACL ELISAs and an in house ß2gp1 assay were optimised and then assessed on 124 sera from normal donors, patients with infection, or patients with APS. A Medline search was screened for papers meeting defined criteria to conduct a meta-analysis. The performance of the assays used in this study was included.

Results—A non-quantitative ACL assay performed at least as well as the anti-ß2gp1 assay in the diagnosis of APS. Meta-analysis confirmed that neither assay is perfect, although the anti-ß2gp1 assay had a higher specificity and lower sensitivity than the ACL assay.

Conclusions—The pooled data suggest that the ACL assay is used to investigate thrombosis without overt underlying pathology and that the improved specificity of the anti-ß2gp1 assay is exploited where infection, connective tissue disease, or atheroma are present.

Key Words: antiphospholipid syndrome • anticardiolipin antibodies • anti-ß2 glycoprotein 1 • sensitivity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
M. A. Ozturk, I. C. Haznedaroglu, M. Turgut, and H. Goker
Current Debates in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: The Acquired Antibody-Mediated Thrombophilia
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2004; 10(2): 89 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
H.A. Schenkein, C.R. Berry, J.A. Burmeister, C.N. Brooks, S.E. Barbour, A.M. Best, and J.G. Tew
Anti-cardiolipin Antibodies in Sera from Patients with Periodontitis
J. Dent. Res., November 1, 2003; 82(11): 919 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.