Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2001;54:385-390; doi:10.1136/jcp.54.5.385
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
J Clin Pathol 2001; 54:385-390
© 2001 Journal of Clinical Pathology

Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system

S S Cross

Section of Oncology and Pathology, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2UL, South Yorkshire, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Cross s.s.cross{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Background—The results of immunohistochemical staining are often assessed by semiquantitative scoring. However, these scoring systems are usually non-standardised and there has been little evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of this subjective assessment.

Aims—To assess the accuracy of observer estimation of proportions of objects in an image.

Methods—Images were generated that contained known proportions of pink squares in grids of 50 x 50 and 100 x 100 squares. Observers were shown each image for five seconds in random order and either estimated the proportion of pink squares or selected the image (from a pair of images) that contained the greater proportion of pink squares. The observers were four consultant histopathologists, seven trainee histopathologists, and six control non-histopathologists.

Results—The raw estimations of proportions showed a close correlation with the real proportions, with correlation coefficients of 0.94 and 0.95 for consultant and trainee histopathologists on the 50 x 50 grids. However, the performance in the comparison task was much higher, with an almost perfect classification for grids of equal size even when the proportions only differed by 5%.

Conclusions—Histopathologists can estimate proportions of objects in an image with a reasonable degree of accuracy in this abstract test system. All observers, whether histopathologists or not, can discriminate between proportions that are only 5% different in equal sized image grids. This suggests that the generation and use of carefully calibrated reference images could greatly improve the accuracy and reliability of semiquantitative scoring of immunohistochemical or any other staining.

Key Words: scoring • immunohistochemistry • semiquantitative • interobserver agreement • {kappa} statistics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sompuram, S. R., Kodela, V., Zhang, K., Ramanathan, H., Radcliffe, G., Falb, P., Bogen, S. A. (2002). A Novel Quality Control Slide for Quantitative Immunohistochemistry Testing. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 50: 1425-1434 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs