© 2001 Journal of Clinical Pathology
Observer accuracy in estimating proportions in images: implications for the semiquantitative assessment of staining reactions and a proposal for a new system
Section of Oncology and Pathology, Division of Genomic Medicine, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2UL, South Yorkshire, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Cross s.s.cross{at}sheffield.ac.uk
BackgroundThe results of immunohistochemical staining are often assessed by semiquantitative scoring. However, these scoring systems are usually non-standardised and there has been little evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of this subjective assessment.
AimsTo assess the accuracy of observer estimation of proportions of objects in an image.
MethodsImages were generated that contained known proportions of pink squares in grids of 50 x 50 and 100 x 100 squares. Observers were shown each image for five seconds in random order and either estimated the proportion of pink squares or selected the image (from a pair of images) that contained the greater proportion of pink squares. The observers were four consultant histopathologists, seven trainee histopathologists, and six control non-histopathologists.
ResultsThe raw estimations of proportions showed a close correlation with the real proportions, with correlation coefficients of 0.94 and 0.95 for consultant and trainee histopathologists on the 50 x 50 grids. However, the performance in the comparison task was much higher, with an almost perfect classification for grids of equal size even when the proportions only differed by 5%.
ConclusionsHistopathologists can estimate proportions of objects in an image with a reasonable degree of accuracy in this abstract test system. All observers, whether histopathologists or not, can discriminate between proportions that are only 5% different in equal sized image grids. This suggests that the generation and use of carefully calibrated reference images could greatly improve the accuracy and reliability of semiquantitative scoring of immunohistochemical or any other staining.
Key Words:
scoring immunohistochemistry semiquantitative interobserver agreement
statistics
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sompuram, S. R., Kodela, V., Zhang, K., Ramanathan, H., Radcliffe, G., Falb, P., Bogen, S. A.
(2002). A Novel Quality Control Slide for Quantitative Immunohistochemistry Testing. J. Histochem. Cytochem.
50: 1425-1434
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
