JCP

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, J
Right arrow Articles by Dallimore, N S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, J
Right arrow Articles by Dallimore, N S
J Clin Pathol 2001; 54:762-765
© 2001 Journal of Clinical Pathology

Conversion to core biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions: is it justified by results?

J Shannon1, A G Douglas-Jones1, N S Dallimore2

1 Department of Pathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
2 Department of Pathology, Llandough Hospital, Penarth, CF64 2XX, UK

Dr Douglas-Jones douglas-jones{at}cf.ac.uk Aims—In recent years there has been increased use of core biopsy for the preoperative diagnosis of screen detected and symptomatic breast lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the quality assessment parameters for preoperative diagnosis by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) before conversion to core biopsy with those for core biopsy after conversion in screening and symptomatic practice. Accuracy of typing and grading of tumours on core biopsy was assessed.

Methods—Correlation of FNAC (C1–5) and core biopsy (B1–5) results (total of 1768 cases) with subsequent available resection histology was performed for 473 FNAC samples in 1997/98, 349 core biopsies in 1998/99 performed in symptomatic practice, for 561 FNAC samples in 1997/98, and 385 core biopsies in 1998/99 performed in screening. Quality assessment parameters were calculated using the methodology detailed in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme guidelines for cytology practice.

Results—Increased absolute and complete specificity, lower inadequate rates, and lower suspicious rates were found for core biopsy compared with FNAC in both symptomatic and screening practice. Typing of tumours was attempted in 86.7% of core biopsies in symptomatic practice and was accurate in 93.6% (132 of 141 where type was stated). Grading of tumours was attempted in 63.5% of invasive carcinomas, with the provisional grade on core biopsy being confirmed on later histology in 75% of grade 1 cases, in 70% of grade 2 cases, and in 86% of grade 3 cases. No case provisionally graded as 1 was subsequently found to be grade 3 and no provisionally grade 3 case was found to be grade 1.

Conclusion—Conversion to core biopsy for the preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions increases specificity and reduces inadequate and suspicious rates. Grading and typing of tumours and assessment of oestrogen receptor status by immunocytochemistry is also possible in core biopsy, thereby increasing diagnostic information available when considering treatment options.

Key Words: breast carcinoma • fine needle aspiration cytology • core biopsy • quality assurance




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
E A Rakha and I O Ellis
An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens
J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1300 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A. G Douglas-Jones, J. L Denson, A. C Cox, I. B Harries, and G. Stevens
Radial scar lesions of the breast diagnosed by needle core biopsy: analysis of cases containing occult malignancy
J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2007; 60(3): 295 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. A. Cahill, D. Walsh, R. J. Landers, and R. G. Watson
Preoperative Profiling of Symptomatic Breast Cancer by Diagnostic Core Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 13(1): 45 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. Kerlikowske, R. Smith-Bindman, B.-M. Ljung, and D. Grady
Evaluation of Abnormal Mammography Results and Palpable Breast Abnormalities
Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2003; 139(4): 274 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
J. C. Woo, T. Yu, and T. C. Hurd
Breast Cancer in Pregnancy: A Literature Review
Arch Surg, January 1, 2003; 138(1): 91 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
M Jeffers, J Shannon, A G Douglas-Jones, and N S Dallimore
Conversion to core biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions: is it justified by results?
J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2002; 55(9): 719 - 720.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Journal of Clinical Pathology Molecular Pathology
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.