|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Short report |
1 Department of Microbiology, Gwent Healthcare NHS Trust, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, Gwent NP20 2UB, South Wales, UK
Dr James email: peter.james{at}gwent.wales.nhs.uk AimTo investigate the clinical value of anaerobic blood culture.
MethodsBlood culture bottles (n = 25 185) submitted for culture over a two year period were reviewed.
ResultsThe bottles yielded 1992 positive patient episodes, a positive rate of 14.4/1000 hospital admissions. Significantly more isolations were obtained from aerobic than from anaerobic bottles. Twelve of the 38 anaerobic episodes were detected in aerobic bottles. Clinical management was influenced in one of 24 patients whose cultures yielded anaerobes from anaerobic bottles only. For a further six patients it was unlikely that the result had any effect on clinical management.
ConclusionsIf aerobic bottles were substituted for the anaerobic bottles, detection of positive patient episodes would increase by at least 6%. A higher yield would be achieved by using two aerobic bottles for routine culture and using anaerobic bottles only for patients where anaerobic culture may influence clinical management.
Key Words: blood culture anaerobes BacT/Alert
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Berger, A. Weinacker, and S. Shafazand Modification of Blood Culture Recommendations? Chest, June 1, 2003; 123(6): 2157 - 2158. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Riley, B. J. Heiter, and P. P. Bourbeau Comparison of Recovery of Blood Culture Isolates from Two BacT/ALERT FAN Aerobic Blood Culture Bottles with Recovery from One FAN Aerobic Bottle and One FAN Anaerobic Bottle J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 213 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| Journal of Clinical Pathology | Molecular Pathology |