HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cowan, W K Articles by Al-Tamimi, S R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cowan, W K Articles by Al-Tamimi, S R. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Breast Cancer

A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme

¹ Breast Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK
² Department of Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK
³ Centre for Health and Medical Research, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK

Dr Angus email: brian.angus{at}ncl.ac.uk Aim—To define the biological nature and malignant potential of interval cancers presenting to a breast unit within the NHS breast screening programme.

Methods—112 interval cancers were compared with matched, screen detected and symptomatic cancers in terms of their radiographic, histopathological, and immunohistochemical features.

Results—Interval cancers, strictly defined, showed no characteristic radiographic pattern. In terms of size, vascular invasion, lymph node status, and prognosis they were intermediate between screen detected and symptomatic cancers. Within the interval cancers there was an excess of grade 1 and grade 3 tumours, and lesions with a high Ki67 index but immunohistochemistry otherwise failed to discriminate between the three groups. Inclusion of data from false negative "interval cancers" did not significantly alter the results.

Conclusions—Interval cancers are more aggressive than screen detected cancers but in general less aggressive than symptomatic cancers. However, within a heterogeneous group, occasional interval cancers are exceptionally malignant.

Key Words: breast cancer screening • interval cancer

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Carney, E. Steiner, M. E. Goodrich, A. J. Dietrich, C. J. Kasales, J. E. Weiss, and T. MacKenzie Discovery of Breast Cancers Within 1 Year of a Normal Screening Mammogram: How Are They Found? Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 512 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Collett, I. M. Stefansson, J. Eide, A. Braaten, H. Wang, G. E. Eide, S. O. Thoresen, W. D. Foulkes, and L. A. Akslen A Basal Epithelial Phenotype Is More Frequent in Interval Breast Cancers Compared with Screen Detected Tumors Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1108 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P J van Diest, E van der Wall, and J P A Baak Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2004; 57(7): 675 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T J Anderson, C Davis, F E Alexander, and H M Dobson Measures of benefit for breast screening from the pathology database for Scotland, 1991-2001 J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2003; 56(9): 654 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]