Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Clinical Pathology 2000;53:140-146; doi:10.1136/jcp.53.2.140
Copyright © 2000 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Association of Clinical Pathologists.
J Clin Pathol 2000; 53:140-146
© 2000 Journal of Clinical Pathology

A study of interval breast cancer within the NHS breast screening programme

W K Cowan1, B Angus2, J C Gray3, L G Lunt1 and S Ramedan Al-Tamimi2

1 Breast Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK
2 Department of Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK
3 Centre for Health and Medical Research, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Angus email: brian.angus{at}ncl.ac.uk

Aim—To define the biological nature and malignant potential of interval cancers presenting to a breast unit within the NHS breast screening programme.

Methods—112 interval cancers were compared with matched, screen detected and symptomatic cancers in terms of their radiographic, histopathological, and immunohistochemical features.

Results—Interval cancers, strictly defined, showed no characteristic radiographic pattern. In terms of size, vascular invasion, lymph node status, and prognosis they were intermediate between screen detected and symptomatic cancers. Within the interval cancers there was an excess of grade 1 and grade 3 tumours, and lesions with a high Ki67 index but immunohistochemistry otherwise failed to discriminate between the three groups. Inclusion of data from false negative "interval cancers" did not significantly alter the results.

Conclusions—Interval cancers are more aggressive than screen detected cancers but in general less aggressive than symptomatic cancers. However, within a heterogeneous group, occasional interval cancers are exceptionally malignant.

Key Words: breast cancer screening • interval cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Carney, P. A., Steiner, E., Goodrich, M. E., Dietrich, A. J., Kasales, C. J., Weiss, J. E., MacKenzie, T. (2006). Discovery of Breast Cancers Within 1 Year of a Normal Screening Mammogram: How Are They Found?. Ann Fam Med 4: 512-518 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Collett, K., Stefansson, I. M., Eide, J., Braaten, A., Wang, H., Eide, G. E., Thoresen, S. O., Foulkes, W. D., Akslen, L. A. (2005). A Basal Epithelial Phenotype Is More Frequent in Interval Breast Cancers Compared with Screen Detected Tumors. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14: 1108-1112 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van Diest, P J, van der Wall, E, Baak, J P A (2004). Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review. J. Clin. Pathol. 57: 675-681 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Anderson, T J, Davis, C, Alexander, F E, Dobson, H M (2003). Measures of benefit for breast screening from the pathology database for Scotland, 1991-2001. J. Clin. Pathol. 56: 654-659 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Pathology jobs

Pathology jobs